17 July
Dear Anthony Horowitz,
I had the enjoyable experience of growing up with your Alex Rider books during my childhood, and also being a fan of Sherlock Holmes, it has also been wonderful seeing you continue those stories. I wanted to write to you regarding something that has intrigued me for a long time: namely, why we find such satisfaction in reading, watching and listening to mysteries.
I remember studying horror cinema in school, and being introduced to the idea that audiences love these films because they find it enjoyable to experience and explore their fears in a safe environment. After this, I went on to study dystopian postmodern literature in depth, and have definitely found that this genre operates as an outlet and a reflection of our existential and material anxieties; a place for them to be thought through to their extremes — and for us to experience the catharsis of externalising them. What then, is the attraction in being plunged into a mystery and having it solved, or watching a protagonist overcome it?
To explore this question, I thought it might be interesting to start with looking at a subversive area of detective fiction rather than the more classic model: metaphysical detective fiction. In metaphysical detective stories (if we take the beginning of this sub-genre to be the work of Edgar Allen Poe and the more modern incarnation to be someone like Paul Auster), there is a sense in which the mystery is not only physical, but also an existential undertaking. The reader is confronted with uncertainty in unreliable narrators and clues that are often from doubtful sources. I see this as being in effect, the extreme of the mystery narrative — if solving mysteries depends on our inbuilt ability to recognise patterns in our environment (and in literature) then metaphysical detective fiction pushes those abilities to their limits, and asks us to keep trying to find and solve patterns in a fictionalised world where they are unreliable and ever-shifting. So, with this in mind, is the attraction of more classic mystery fiction the satisfaction of seeing our pattern recognition and problem solving abilities be victorious by the end of the book?
My line of thinking, obvious as it might be, is then that the satisfied feeling of reaching the end of a mystery and having it solved, of the protagonist triumphing on our behalf, is not just confined to the story itself. It is also an ontological satisfaction, whereby we are reassured that our method of conceptualising the world around us is working correctly, that we can continue to exist knowing we can trust our senses and our minds. While metaphysical detective stories leave us often still disorientated at the end, still questioning every single clue and character, classic mysteries (whether detective or action and adventure) tie up most, if not all, of the loose ends and present us with not only an ending to the book, but a view of ourselves as competent and ontologically consistent. I wondered, as someone who writes so much in this genre, whether you would agree?
I think our of love mysteries reflects a deep yearning that we have as humans for certainty in our beliefs about the world, a certainty that is unlikely to ever be achieved, as it’s not probable (in my view) that we will ever know everything there is to know about our physical environment and ontology that we wish to know. While this yearning may often be more directly expressed in philosophy and the experimentation of hard science subjects, I think that mysteries, adventure stories and detective fiction all offer us a place to be reassured of the things that we have to rely on (namely, our senses and reasoning abilities) while encountering and experimenting with things that we cannot rely on, such as problems with unknown factors and characters with incomplete stories. Though I personally believe this experience is enjoyable for the existential reasons I mention, I wondered if you agree — or perhaps you completely disagree? I would be very intrigued to hear you thoughts ether way, as who better to contribute to a discussion on this subject.
Yours sincerely,
Eleanor
Eleanor